tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6831810813762214573.post5414796419679046271..comments2023-12-23T02:31:53.346+11:00Comments on The ShadowLands: I am not supersticious but...Margo's Maidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07033240632142631251noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6831810813762214573.post-64044781757537967592008-09-15T20:27:00.000+10:002008-09-15T20:27:00.000+10:00Hey 1.6 - waving back. Thanks kae, but it was mean...Hey 1.6 - waving back. <BR/><BR/>Thanks kae, but it was meant to be mis-spelt (same as in the post) because I am so ironic or something.Margo's Maidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07033240632142631251noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6831810813762214573.post-12625026917571447872008-09-15T17:28:00.000+10:002008-09-15T17:28:00.000+10:00MM, waves 1.618MM, waves 1.618Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6831810813762214573.post-75757297302020120772008-09-15T14:03:00.000+10:002008-09-15T14:03:00.000+10:00actually... why the hell are these guys building t...actually... why the hell are these guys building this thing? to see what happens if they 'recreate the big bang?'<BR/>On the one hand, when they're talking up the importance of it, they're going to "recreate the big<BR/> bang" and "create miniature black holes", then when they are allaying fears of disaster, they're only "simulate events that happen in the atmosphere every day".<BR/>uh... doublespeak alert. which is it?<BR/><BR/>FWIW, if there is even the tiniest, remotest chance that they are wrong and it is in fact dangerous, surely that's enough reason to not go ahead with it?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6831810813762214573.post-53611358980948336552008-09-15T11:59:00.000+10:002008-09-15T11:59:00.000+10:00Psst, there's a tit in that.Superstitious... as op...Psst, there's a tit in that.<BR/>Superstitious... as opposed to stupidsticious, which is different, I'm sure.kaehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05819693069445947851noreply@blogger.com